Bookmaker Atlas · Cluster File
Fatpirate is a sportsbook operator group. The brands below are run under the same corporate parent (same ownership, often different licences and country availability).
Median trust score in this cluster: 36/100. That is 4 points below the Atlas-wide median of 40/100. Within the Operator group category, this cluster's median sits at position 24 of 138 (sorted lowest to highest).
Across 3 scored brands: 1 at 40-59, 2 under 40.
Country availability is not reported for the 3 brands in this cluster.
Atlas has not aggregated specific red-flag patterns for this cluster yet.
Brands in the Fatpirate cluster typically share an operator, an odds engine, or both. Operator-level decisions (payout policy, account limits, dispute handling) tend to repeat across siblings.
Step 1
Fines or licence actions against one brand in an operator group usually signal the same behaviour at the siblings. Atlas tracks these on the brand-level audit.
Step 2
Operators often run different brands under different licences. The licence determines your dispute rights, not the brand name on the storefront.
Step 3
Operators sometimes restrict brands by region for licensing reasons. Confirm your country is on the active list, not just the marketing page.
Step 4
Bonus wagering and abuse-clause language is often shared across sibling brands. If one brand has a reputation for confiscating wins, the others likely use the same playbook.
Of the 3 brands Atlas tracks in this cluster, 3 hold no documented Tier 1, 2, or 3 licence in the public registries Atlas reads. Brand-level licence is the single biggest variable that determines your dispute rights, segregated-funds protection, and complaint channel; a cluster without strict regulator representation is a structural signal worth weighing before depositing.
The 3 brands in the Fatpirate cluster collectively accept players from 0 countries. Atlas tracks the footprint per-brand from public terms of service and active payment-rail coverage; aggregating across the cluster gives a rough sense of which regions the cluster's operators target.
They share an operator, an odds engine, a platform, or all three. Atlas tracks the affiliation so a player can see when "different" brands are run by the same back-end. The grouping comes from public regulator filings, corporate ownership disclosures, and infrastructure fingerprinting, not from guesswork.
Often yes. A withdrawal delay, an independent web-security flag, or a regulator action against one brand in the cluster is usually a sign of the same on the rest. Atlas score components that track infrastructure (security, threat intelligence) tend to move together for sibling brands.
License jurisdiction is the single biggest reason. A brand licensed in the UK or Malta gives a player binding dispute-resolution rights that the same operator running under a Caribbean license does not. Brand-specific support staffing and country availability also matter.
Tied to the operator in most clusters. If the operator has a payout-delay history, the player will see it regardless of which brand label they signed up under. Atlas surfaces the operator-level evidence on every clone page.
Each brand scores independently, but the evidence trail often overlaps. If a regulator fines the operator, every sibling brand under that operator picks up the fine in the threat-intelligence component. The license component scores per-brand because licenses are issued per-brand.
Trust score computed from 6 weighted components (licensing, corporate, security, reviews, threat intel, operational). License data verified against public authority records. Last verified 53 days ago.
Gamble responsibly.
Sports betting involves risk. Only bet what you can afford to lose. Bookmakers listed here may not be legal in your jurisdiction. Verify local laws before registering an account.
Support is available 24/7: GamCare | BeGambleAware | National Council on Problem Gambling (US)
18+ Must be of legal gambling age in your jurisdiction.
