If you're starting Volume Betting, you'll hear the same rule of thumb again and again: keep ~70% of your bankroll on bookmakers and ~30% on the exchange.

It's not a magic number. It's a practical operating system.

fewer days where your bankroll is technically "fine"

… but you're forced into a break because funds are stuck in the wrong place

In this post, I'll explain the logic behind 70/30, show you example allocations for €5k / €20k / €50k, and connect it to the exchange mechanics that matter (including why we recommend 

What the 70/30 split actually means (and what it's trying to prevent)

The 70/30 bankroll split is designed to solve one recurring volume-betting problem:

⚠️ Warning: You don't "run out of bankroll" — you run out of 

your bookie balances are high, but you can't lay the next bet because your exchange doesn't have enough for liability, or

your exchange balance is high, but your bookie accounts don't have enough to place the back bets you want (or you're mid-withdrawal).

This balance is essential because it ensures you can place high-stakes bets on bookmakers and cover outcomes on the exchange without delays.

So the goal isn't "70/30 because someone said so." The goal is 

Why ~70% on bookies: you can't generate turnover from the exchange alone

, your turnover (and VIP progression) happens on bookmakers.

That's why the baseline recommendation is ~70% on cryptobookmakers: it gives you enough liquidity to "take full advantage of high-stakes opportunities" and scale activity as bankroll grows.

Practical reasons the bookie side needs to be bigger

You need enough balance to stake like a "real" bettor

 — A lot of volume success comes from acting like a high-value customer and placing meaningful stakes in liquid markets.

You'll spread funds across multiple bookies

 — Even if you "main" one book, real workflows spread risk and keep you flexible.

Bookie limits and liquidity are best in big events

 — Focus on high-liquidity markets (Top 5 football leagues, major tournaments, Grand Slams, major US sports).

💡 Pro Tip: The fastest way to make 70% feel "too small" is running too many bookies at once on a small bankroll. With €5k, your "70% on bookies" should still be concentrated—don't scatter €200 across ten sites. For a clean overview of which bookies fit volume workflows, check 

Why ~30% on the exchange: lay liability is the silent bankroll killer

The exchange is what makes volume betting operationally safe. But it's also where your money gets tied up.

The recommendation of ~30% on betting exchanges is explicitly to cover lay liability and ensure you can "manage all outcomes… and avoid delays in executing lay bets."

The real reason people stall: not enough exchange coverage

 You find a perfect low-odds favourite at a bookie and want to stake €2,000.

If your exchange balance is low, you can't place the lay fast enough.

If you can't lay fast enough, you either skip bets (lost turnover) or you take exposure (bad).

That's why "30% on exchange" is less about comfort and more about 

The key concept: odds determine liability

This is the bit most people misunderstand.

Your exchange doesn't just hold a "mirror stake." It holds 

 — which can be much bigger than your back stake at higher odds.

Low odds reduce the liability you need to cover when laying. A back bet at 1.35 needs far less exchange liability than one at 5.00, which makes bankroll management much easier.

 → lower liability → you can place more bets simultaneously

 → higher liability → the exchange side gets locked up faster

That's also why many volume workflows prioritise low odds for efficient turnover: you recycle funds faster and avoid tying up too much capital.

⚠️ Warning: "Always low odds" can be a trap on some platforms (some reduce how low-odds bets count toward VIP). Sportsbet.io is an example where low-odds turnover is reduced in VIP calculations. So: low odds are a tool, not a religion.

Exchange netting: why your 30% can go further than you think

Exchange netting reduces how much capital is tied up by offsetting positions and calculating exposure based on worst-case scenario rather than stacking liabilities on every single bet. For volume bettors, this increases flexibility, boosts turnover capacity, and lowers liquidity requirements.

💡 Pro Tip: Netting shines most in high-liquidity markets (where you can actually get matched quickly and prices don't drift). For the cleanest breakdown of how our recommended exchange setup works, read the 

Example allocations for €5k / €20k / €50k bankroll

Let's turn the 70/30 rule into real numbers.

 Keep bookies concentrated (2–4 accounts max at first). Stay mostly in low odds to keep exchange liability manageable.

At €20k, you can run a "main book + supporting cast" setup without constant rebalancing.

📌 Suggested distribution (more flexible):

Main book (highest limits / best VIP): €6,000

At this level, you can scale aggressively—because you can keep liquidity where it needs to be without "money-shuffling downtime."

 — A €50,000 bankroll can generate €136,000 turnover in a single weekend by placing multiple bets across staggered kickoffs in high-liquidity leagues—turning the bankroll over 2.72× in two days.

That's the real value of proper allocation: not safety—it's 

The best bankroll split is the one that matches your current bet style.

you're doing more higher-odds volume (liability rises)

you're laying multiple outcomes frequently (liability can stack)

you keep failing to get matched because your exchange side is thin

your exchange balance keeps sitting unused

 because it balances bookie liquidity for staking, exchange coverage for lay bets, and scalable operations as bankroll grows.

Why BFB247 matters here: commission + liquidity + no "expert fee" headache

If you're going to keep 30% of your bankroll on an exchange, the platform choice matters.

We recommend using a low-commission exchange because commission quietly eats ROI at volume. 

 offers 2.5% commission via a specific signup link.

It integrates Orbit Exchange (Betfair-powered), giving high liquidity and market variety

It supports crypto deposits for smooth fund management

It avoids Betfair-style "expert/premium" fees (Orbit via BFB247 doesn't levy them)

If you're new to exchange mechanics, start here: 

Practical operating rules to avoid "stuck bankroll" days

If you're constantly forced into emergency transfers, your split isn't wrong—your workflow is. Emphasize liquidity management, minimizing delays, and scaling operations by keeping funds available for both bookies and exchange coverage.

2) Prefer staggered kickoffs to roll funds multiple times per day

This is how volume becomes scalable. Roll bankroll multiple times daily by focusing on events with staggered kickoffs.

3) Keep stake sizing aligned with liquidity and bankroll

Avoid overextending and verify exchange liquidity—especially as odds rise, because liability grows fast.

4) Use tools so you don't lose turnover to execution errors

Execution speed isn't just convenience—it's profit protection. Find bets faster with 

 open while you learn. And if you're still ramping bankroll: 

70/30 Bankroll Split for Volume Betting Explained

If your goal is €3000 per month with Volume Betting, the correct way to think about it is not "how good am I at picking bets?" but:

What % profit can I reliably earn on that turnover (after commission + normal losses)?

How many times can I "roll" my bankroll each week without getting stuck by liabilities, limits, or slow money movement?

That's exactly how the Volume Betting "engine" works: build consistent activity, focus on high-liquidity markets, and profit primarily from VIP rewards like cashback/bonuses rather than pure odds value. Check out our full 

Below is a practical model you can use to estimate the bankroll you'll need—and the workload you should expect.

Monthly profit comes from turnover × profit rate

Monthly Profit = Monthly Turnover × Profit % on Turnover

So to hit €3000/month, your required turnover depends on your realistic profit rate. Here are three scenarios that match how serious volume bettors actually operate (often accepting slightly negative "pure bet EV" because VIP rewards carry the strategy):

📊 Required turnover for €3000/month:

⚠️ Warning: Your "profit % on turnover" is not a fixed law of nature. It depends on VIP level, cashback terms, the books you're using, commission, and how consistently you can keep accounts alive. Sustainability and account health are core to the strategy.

Turning turnover into bankroll: the rollover model

Turnover is bankroll × how many times you roll it

Bankroll Needed = Turnover Needed ÷ Monthly Rollover Multiple

The key is rolling over your bankroll multiple times daily by focusing on events with staggered kickoffs and avoiding tying funds up in long-term bets.

A concrete example: a €50,000 bankroll can generate €136,000 turnover in one weekend (a 2.72× rollover over Saturday+Sunday). That's powerful when:

you keep kickoffs stacked through the day

Three realistic workload scenarios (and bankroll ranges)

Below I'll assume a "realistic" target profit rate of 

 (you can swap in your own number from the table earlier).

Scenario A: Weekend-focused (busy weekends, light weekdays)

You mainly grind Saturdays/Sundays (best fixtures, easiest to chain turnover)

Monthly rollover multiple: ~6× to 8× bankroll per month

 Turnover needed at 2.5%: €120,000/month. Bankroll = €120,000 ÷ (6 to 8) = 

 2–4 hours per weekend day. Weekdays: quick maintenance (balances, checking limits, queuing next slate).

💡 Pro Tip: If you only "work" weekends, your biggest enemy is not betting skill—it's funds getting stuck (liabilities, slow withdrawals, funds spread too thin). Liquidity, timing, and smooth money flow are the unlock.

Scenario B: Part-time daily (1–2 rolls per day)

You bet most days, but you're not living in the markets

. This lines up with the typical guidance that starting directly with volume betting requires at least ~€10k starting bankroll to be operationally viable.

 45–90 minutes per day on average (more on weekends, less on dead weekdays). You'll feel "flow" once you have reliable books, a routine, and a clean exchange setup (see 

⚠️ Warning: €8k–€12k can work on paper, but in the real world it's tight. A few frictions (temporary limits, delayed withdrawals, exchange liability spikes) can force "unplanned downtime," which kills turnover.

Scenario C: Full-time / aggressive (2–3 rolls per day + stacked weekends)

You're optimizing kickoffs, juggling multiple books, and maximizing high-volume days

This is mathematically possible, but practically it's the least stable because you'll be constrained by exchange liabilities and market availability, you'll spend more time moving money, and you'll be more sensitive to one book restricting you.

My practical recommendation for €3000/month

If you want this to be sustainable (not a one-month sprint), you'll usually be happiest around:

 if you want it to feel easy and scale further

Bigger bankroll improves flexibility, lets you use higher odds when needed, and reduces the chance you hit a liquidity wall.

The "hidden" bankroll cost: exchange liability + fund allocation

Even if your "bankroll math" says €12k, you still have to structure it correctly.

 so you can always cover lay liability and keep bets flowing.

This matters because volume betting is an operations game. If your exchange side is short, you can't lay properly, and you'll be forced to pause.

Low odds reduce liability (and boost rollover capacity)

Many volume bettors lean toward low odds: lower odds = lower exchange liability, which lets you recycle funds faster.

 Backing at 1.30–1.40 typically ties up far less exchange liability than backing at 3.00+, so your same bankroll can create more total turnover in a day.

What does the "day-to-day" workload actually look like?

Here's the most realistic breakdown for someone targeting €3000/month.

Check today's slate (focus on major leagues / high liquidity)

Place 3–10 back bets (depending on bankroll)

Track bets + balances (don't skip this—scaling without tracking is how people lose control)

Recycle funds into later kickoffs (staggered kickoffs are key)

Chain kickoffs through the day (football + tennis + US sports if you have edges in workflow)

Your objective is not "best value." It's maximum clean turnover while staying "normal."

💡 Pro Tip: Use tools to cut decision time. The faster you can go from "match found → stake set → lay placed → logged," the more turnover you can produce per hour. Start with: 

The biggest misconception: "I need positive EV bets"

A common newbie instinct is to try to add arbitrage/value on top of volume betting.

Volume Betting profits are primarily derived from VIP rewards

—cashback, enhanced odds, bonuses, and fee reductions—while maintaining sustainable accounts.

That means your base betting can be slightly negative, as long as VIP rewards outweigh it over time.

⚠️ Warning: If you chase pure arbs aggressively, you often shorten account lifespan (and losing accounts kills your long-term ROI). Sustainability is the whole game. If you're still building bankroll, this is why starting with 

A complete "bankroll plan" to hit €3000/month

Here's a practical target that balances the math with reality:

Step 3: Choose a bankroll that removes friction

Recommended bankroll to make it sustainable: €20,000–€35,000

Supports the 70/30 allocation without starving the exchange side

Makes turnover targets achievable without "all-day grinding"

Step 4: Use calculators to sanity-check stakes

How fast can I realistically reach €3000/month?

If you already have bankroll and a smooth setup, the bottleneck is usually turnover capacity, not knowledge. The key is consistent activity and scaling through optimized betting flow.

It varies widely by VIP status and book quality. A useful working band is 

. Conservative planning keeps you alive when a month is "dry" on rewards.

Bankroll Needed for €3000/Month With Volume Betting

Netting is one of those "boring" exchange concepts that quietly makes you a lot of money over a year.

Not because it magically creates EV—but because it reduces the two things that kill long-term volume bettors:

 (your bankroll sitting locked, doing nothing)

If you've ever wondered why your exchange balance feels "stuck" even though your positions look hedged… or why commission feels higher than it should… this is the missing piece.

, and exactly how to use the Sharkbetting 

💡 Pro Tip: If you're doing high turnover (Stake/Gamdom style or classic arbs), netting becomes more important the bigger you scale. Start with the framework here: 

 means the exchange charges commission based on your 

 in a market, rather than charging commission separately on every individual winning bet.

When you have multiple lay bets on the same event, the exchange only charges commission on your net profit per outcome, not on each individual bet.

active trading (pre-match + in-play adjustments)

If you're placing one back and one lay per match, commission is annoying—but manageable. When you start firing lots of bets, commission becomes a compounding tax, because you're often creating multiple "winning bet tickets" within the same match.

You place several lays across different outcomes (or you hedge multiple bookmaker backs).

 (because any lay that isn't on the winning selection wins).

If commission were charged per winning ticket, you'd get clipped multiple times on the same outcome.

Netting prevents that. It charges commission on the 

Bet 1 wins €500 → €25 commission (5%)

Bet 2 wins €300 → €15 commission (5%)

Outcome net: €500 + €300 - €200 = €600

Commission charged once: €600 × 2.5% = €15

That's not a rounding error. That's the difference between a strategy that scales cleanly… and one that gets eaten alive by fees.

💡 Pro Tip: Commission rate matters, but netting matters 

 when you have many tickets per match. The calculator highlights BFB247/Orbit at 

Netting also frees up liquidity (bound liability)

Commission savings are the obvious win. The bigger (and more underrated) win is 

When you place multiple bets within the same 1X2 market, your profit in one outcome can partially offset losses in another outcome. That means the exchange doesn't need to "hold" the full liability for every individual bet—only the 

Sharkbetting's netting calculator calls this 

"I need €10,000 to place these hedges" into

"I only need €1,500 bound, so I can place 

📌 Important: this is not "free money." It's capital efficiency. You're still exposed to the worst-case scenario—netting just stops your exchange from locking 

How to use the Sharkbetting Netting Calculator (step-by-step)

. The page tells you exactly what it's designed for: "Calculate commission savings with exchange netting for 1X2 markets."

. Use the number you actually pay (not what you 

⚠️ Warning: If you're on Betfair and you're not sure about premium/expert fee exposure long-term, read this before you scale: 

Step 2: Add your exchange LAY bets (1 / X / 2)

, you'll see fields for each outcome: Lay Odds and Lay Stake (€). Fill in what you've placed (or what you plan to place).

Step 3 (optional): Add bookmaker BACK bets

 with the same 1 / X / 2 structure. If you're only evaluating exchange-side netting, set them to zero. The calculator explicitly says: "Set back stake/odds to 0 if you don't want to include bookmaker bets in P/L calculation."

 that breaks down outcome net before commission, net after commission, bookmaker impact, and total P/L.

Worked example 1: How netting cuts commission

Let's say you've got multiple positions in the same match and end up with these 

If Away wins, these lay bets resolve like this:

Lay Away: loses liability = (€5.00 − 1) × €200 = 

Net profit (Away outcome) = €1,000 + €300 − €800 = 

 Commission on €1,000 = €25, on €300 = €7.50. Total = 

. Do that hundreds of times per month and you'll understand why netting is a scaling weapon.

Worked example 2: How netting frees liquidity

 Lose (1.80 − 1) × €1,000 = €800, Win €300 + €200 = €500. Net = 

 Lose (4.00 − 1) × €300 = €900, Win €1,000 + €200 = €1,200. Net = 

 Lose (5.00 − 1) × €200 = €800, Win €1,000 + €300 = €1,300. Net = 

. That's your true "at risk" amount across the whole market.

But without thinking in netted terms, a lot of bettors treat liability as: €800 + €900 + €800 = €2,500 tied up. That's why they "run out of exchange balance" even though their positions are logically hedged.

How netting fits into matched betting and volume betting

Netting isn't just for traders. It becomes crucial when you're doing any strategy where the same event gets hit multiple times.

 and taking multiple edges across the same match (sometimes on different outcomes), you naturally build a cluster of lays. That's where you win twice: you reduce commission leakage and you free liquidity so you can keep firing.

Blog & Guides

70/30 Bankroll Split for Volume Betting Explained

Bankroll Needed for €3000/Month With Volume Betting

Netting Explained: Reduce Commission and Free Up Liquidity

Stake vs Gamdom for Volume Betting: When to Focus on One (and When to Run Both)

When 95% Bets Make Sense: Extend Account Lifespan

Gamdom VIP & Bonus Changes (2026): What Bettors Are Seeing, What It Means, and How to Adapt

Matched Betting vs Value Betting: The Low-Risk Strategy That Usually Wins