Verified comparison
Sharkbetting logo

From โ‚ฌ1/mo

VS
Trademate Sports logo

From โ‚ฌ110/mo

Sharkbetting vs Trademate Sports

Side-by-side on 21 dimensions. Sharkbetting wins 12, Trademate Sports wins 1, 8 ties.

Sharkbetting wins 12Trademate Sports wins 1Ties: 8

Overall score

Sharkbetting

7.4

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

vs

Trademate Sports

2.1

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

Score = wins (1pt) + ties (0.5pt) per 21 dimensions

Sharkbetting

โ‚ฌ1/mo

vs

Trademate Sports

โ‚ฌ110/mo

Open methodology

Built in EU.|GDPR compliant.|Permanent free tier.

0

Sharkbetting wins

0

Trademate Sports wins

0

Ties

Our take

Quick verdict at a glance

Pick Sharkbetting if

Pick Sharkbetting if you want Betfair + Polymarket exchange comparison and matched betting from EUR 0.

Pick Trademate Sports if

Pick Trademate if you are a pure value bettor who trusts Pinnacle as the sharpest market baseline.

Which tool fits you?

Answer 3 questions for a personalized recommendation.

Question 1 of 3

What is your monthly betting volume?

Introduction

Trademate Sports launched out of Norway and built a strong following among serious EU value bettors. The core thesis is simple: Pinnacle prices are the sharpest odds in the market because Pinnacle accepts winning players and adjusts its lines accordingly. If Bet365 or Unibet is offering higher odds than Pinnacle's closing line, that gap is expected value. Trademate Core covers soft bookmakers at approximately $120/mo (the most popular tier); Pro covers betting exchanges and Asian books at approximately $400/mo. There is also a US-only $49/mo tier that is geo-restricted to US sports and not relevant for EU bettors. Trademate's 2-week trial is the only try-before-you-buy option, with no permanent free tier.

Sharkbetting reaches the same goal by a different route. Rather than using Pinnacle as the sharp baseline, it compares bookmaker odds against live Betfair and Polymarket exchange prices in real time. The getDelta formula calculates outcome_rating = ((bookmaker_price - 1) / (exchange_price - 1)) * 100. Any rating above 100 means the bookmaker odds exceed the implied exchange fair price, which is the definition of a value bet used by professional bettors. The dual-exchange support, combining Betfair's deep European liquidity with Polymarket's prediction-market pricing, is unusual among EU tools.

The second key difference is scope. Trademate is a pure value-betting scanner; it does not include matched-betting workflow, an oddsmatcher, lay-bet calculators, or exchange integration for hedging. Sharkbetting bundles all of these: Oddsmatcher, BFB247 exchange access, calculators, BetStream community feed, and Telegram alerts in a single platform. For EU bettors who want to run matched betting and value betting from one dashboard at EUR 0 entry, Sharkbetting is the logical choice.

Best for which bettor?

Four bettor profiles, head-to-head verdicts.

  • Best for arb hunters

    Multi-leg arbitrage finder with low-margin bookmaker coverage and cross-exchange pricing.

    Sharkbetting
    Trademate Sports
  • Best for matched-betting beginners

    Step-by-step workflow, free starter tier, and EU bookmaker coverage built for first-timers.

    Sharkbetting
    Trademate Sports
  • Best for analytical pros

    Both tools surface positive-EV picks, but workflows differ by data depth and refresh cadence.

    Sharkbetting
    Trademate Sports
  • Best for US bettors on DraftKings or FanDuel

    US-focused props and US-state bookmaker integrations win when the action is stateside.

    Sharkbetting
    Trademate Sports

Side-by-side comparison

FeatureSharkbettingTrademate Sports
โ€ขpricing
Free tierโ“˜
Lowest paid planโ“˜โ‚ฌ1/month$120/month
Highest paid planโ“˜โ‚ฌ1/month$400/month
โ€ขspeed
Refresh rateโ“˜10sreal-time
โ€ขcoverage
Bookmakers coveredโ“˜2030
Markets supportedโ“˜
1x2TotalsSpread
1x2TotalsMoneyline
Geographic coverageโ“˜
Global
EUNordics
โ€ขmethod
Value (+EV) finderโ“˜
Arbitrage finderโ“˜
Matched-betting toolโ“˜
Volume betting workflow (VIP/cashback)โ“˜
Exchange comparisonโ“˜
Polymarket integrationโ“˜
โ€ขux
Telegram alertsโ“˜
Mobile appโ“˜
API accessโ“˜NoneNone
โ€ขtrust
Methodology publishedโ“˜
โ€ขcoverage
Crypto-bookmaker support (Stake, Roobet, etc)โ“˜
โ€ขmethod
Exchange-baseline rating systemโ“˜
โ€ขux
Community trade feed (BetStream)โ“˜
โ€ขpricing
Free Pro for active exchange clientsโ“˜

Where each tool wins, at a glance

Aggregate scores across pricing, speed, coverage, methodology, UX, and trust signals (0 to 10). Higher is better.

Sharkbetting7/10avg across categories
Trademate Sports3/10avg across categories

Pricing comparison

Prices verified as of the last review date, normalized to EUR for easy comparison. Check each provider for current offers.

Sharkbetting

Free tier available
  • Free tierYes
  • Lowest paid planโ‚ฌ1/mo
  • Highest paid planโ‚ฌ1/mo

Trademate Sports

  • Free tierNo
  • Lowest paid planโ‚ฌ110/mo
  • Highest paid planโ‚ฌ368/mo

How much does each cost over time?

Subscription cost only. Excludes any betting profit you generate.

Sharkbettingโ‚ฌ12Pro plan
Trademate Sportsโ‚ฌ1,320Lowest plan

After 12 months

You save approx. โ‚ฌ1,308

Active BFB247 exchange clients get Sharkbetting Pro included at no extra cost, making the saving even larger.

Sharkbetting Pro: โ‚ฌ12 total
Trademate Sports (lowest): โ‚ฌ1,320 total

How we tested

How we score

Last updated:

Reviewed by Erik Andersson, Content and Marketing Specialist. Read more โ†’

Tested across 2,400+ price snapshots between February and April 2026, sampled hourly across NBA, NFL, EPL, La Liga, and Champions League markets. Every comparison is built from verified primary sources: live pricing pages, official documentation, and direct product testing. No affiliate relationships influence our rankings.

  • Pricing25%

    Plan cost, free tier breadth, and ROI versus typical bankroll.

  • Methodology25%

    Match math, exchange baseline, and how edges are calculated.

  • Coverage20%

    Bookmakers, markets, and leagues tracked in real time.

  • Speed15%

    Refresh rate, alerting latency, and data freshness.

  • UX10%

    Apps, community channels, onboarding, and documentation.

  • Trust5%

    Methodology transparency, evidence sourcing, and review independence.

Full methodology details on our /methodology page โ†’

Why Sharkbetting wins

  1. 1

    The price difference alone shapes this comparison. Trademate Core costs approximately $120/mo for soft-bookmaker value betting. Sharkbetting Pro is EUR 1/mo covering the same EU bookmakers and leagues, and the BFB247 partnership grants Pro-tier access for free to clients who place 10+ exchange bets per month (via our BFB247 link or directly on sharkbetx). On the free plan, bettors get 8-minute odds refresh across all markets and bookmakers with no time limit. That is roughly 120:1 at paid tier, and 0:1 on the free plan.

  2. 2

    The methodology comparison is genuinely close, but Sharkbetting's exchange-as-baseline approach has a structural advantage in EU markets. Betfair's liquidity on Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, and Champions League is deep enough that exchange prices are updated faster than any sportsbook, including Pinnacle. Sharkbetting's 5-second Polymarket bridge adds a second independent sharp-market signal. The getDelta formula is fully published, so bettors can audit exactly how ratings are calculated.

  3. 3

    Volume betting is a workflow Trademate does not offer. Sharkbetting is the only platform designed for matched betting at higher stakes, targeting VIP tiers and 2-5% monthly cashback across bookmakers. Turnover tracking and BFB247 integration are built for bettors scaling toward 6-figure annual stakes. Trademate is a pure value-betting scanner with no VIP-tracking, no cashback-optimization layer, and no volume-betting workflow whatsoever.

  4. 4

    Sharkbetting indexes crypto-bookmaker odds from Stake, Roobet, BC.Game, Cloudbet, and FortuneJack. Crypto-books represent a fast-growing modern niche with anonymous play, instant withdrawals, and aggressive promotional offers, but no other value-betting tool tracks them. Trademate focuses on traditional EU sportsbooks and overlooks this segment entirely. For bettors building Bitcoin or USDT bankrolls, this difference is decisive.

  5. 5

    Matched betting is a complete Sharkbetting category where Trademate does not compete. Trademate's Pro tier targets exchange and Asian book arbitrage for sophisticated bettors with large bankrolls. Sharkbetting's Oddsmatcher, BFB247 integration, and lay-bet calculators serve EU matched bettors from beginner to professional level in one workflow. A bettor who starts on Sharkbetting's free plan doing matched betting can graduate to value betting via Match View without switching platforms or upgrading unnecessarily.

  6. 6

    Finally, accessibility matters. Trademate's $120/mo Core entry and $20,000 recommended bankroll for Pro effectively exclude bettors who are still learning. Sharkbetting's free plan, 1,200-member Discord community, and step-by-step guides lower the barrier to professional betting methodology without a financial penalty for being a beginner.

Where Trademate Sports is stronger

  1. 1

    Trademate Sports has earned its reputation over nearly a decade of operation and Nordic brand recognition that Sharkbetting has not yet matched. For Norwegian, Swedish, and Danish bettors who have been using Trademate since launch, the brand trust and track record are real advantages. Independent reviews report 4%+ ROI per bet on Core, and the educational content library built over 10 years is substantial.

  2. 2

    The Pinnacle-baseline methodology is a genuine differentiator on the pure value-betting dimension. Pinnacle accepts winning players and sharpens its lines aggressively; using Pinnacle closing odds as truth is the standard approach taught in professional betting courses. Bettors who believe Pinnacle's closing line is the most reliable sharp-market signal may prefer Trademate's methodology over exchange-as-baseline.

  3. 3

    On bookmaker count, Trademate Core covers approximately 30 soft bookmakers versus Sharkbetting's 20 global books, a meaningful difference for bettors who need coverage across regional EU platforms like Coral and William Hill. Trademate Pro also targets betting exchanges and Asian bookmakers directly, which appeals to high-volume bettors with bankrolls above GBP 20,000. That niche is intentionally high-ceiling and is not a Sharkbetting focus.

Which tool fits your situation

Each scenario scored based on features, pricing, and workflow fit.

Sharkbetting wins

Best for starting free

Sharkbetting's free plan is permanent with all markets, all bookmakers, and all leagues, forever. Trademate offers a two-week trial then requires approximately $120/mo minimum on Core. For anyone testing value-betting methodology before committing, the EUR 0 entry is decisive.

Tie

Best for Nordics + EU bettors

Both Trademate Sports and Sharkbetting were built with Nordics and EU bettors in mind. Trademate is Norwegian-founded and has a decade of brand recognition across Scandinavia. Sharkbetting covers the same EU leagues with Betfair exchange integration and a BFB247 partnership that is also EU-focused. Geography alone does not split these two.

Tie

Best for value bettors

Both tools use a sharp-market baseline to find positive-EV bets. Trademate uses Pinnacle's closing line as truth; Sharkbetting uses live Betfair and Polymarket exchange prices. Pinnacle is the sharpest sportsbook; Betfair is the sharpest exchange. Each methodology is defensible, and experienced +EV bettors disagree on which is superior.

Sharkbetting wins

Best for matched betting

Sharkbetting is a matched-betting platform: Oddsmatcher, BFB247 exchange integration, lay-bet calculators, and BetStream community feed are all included. Trademate is a pure value-betting scanner. It has no oddsmatcher, no exchange workflow, and no matched-betting calculator. EU matched bettors should choose Sharkbetting.

Sharkbetting wins

Best for casual bettors

Trademate recommends a minimum bankroll of GBP 20,000 for its Pro tier and expects sophisticated data analytics usage. That bar is too high for casual or part-time bettors. Sharkbetting's permanent free plan with guided calculators and a 1,200-member Discord community is far more accessible at zero cost.

Sharkbetting vs Trademate Sports: feature breakdown

Methodology

Sharkbetting wins

Trademate Sports uses Pinnacle's closing line as the sharp-market benchmark. If a soft bookmaker like Bet365 offers odds higher than Pinnacle's closing price, that gap is flagged as expected value. Sharkbetting's Match View uses live Betfair and Polymarket exchange prices as the baseline via the getDelta formula: outcome_rating = ((bookmaker_price - 1) / (exchange_price - 1)) * 100. Both approaches identify the same class of bets. Exchange prices update faster than Pinnacle in EU markets; Pinnacle is considered the sharpest sportsbook globally. Experienced bettors use both.

Pricing structure

Sharkbetting wins

Trademate Core is approximately $120/mo targeting soft bookmakers (the most popular tier); Pro is approximately $400/mo for exchanges and Asian books. There is also a US-only $49/mo tier geo-restricted to US sports. Trademate's 2-week trial is available via referral code, with 10% off the first paid month. Sharkbetting has 2 tiers: Free (permanent, 8-minute refresh) and Pro at EUR 1/mo (10-second refresh). Active BFB247 clients with 10+ exchange bets in 30 days (via our BFB247 link or directly on sharkbetx) receive Pro free. The price difference is effectively 120:1 in Sharkbetting's favor before the BFB247 free-access route is counted.

Coverage

Trademate Sports wins

Trademate Core covers approximately 30 soft bookmakers including Bet365, William Hill, Coral, and Unibet across EU markets. Pro adds betting exchanges and Asian books. Sharkbetting covers 20+ bookmakers globally on all plans, including Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Champions League, NBA, and NFL. Both platforms focus on EU sports markets. Neither has strong US sportsbook coverage. Trademate's 30 Core bookmakers versus Sharkbetting's 20 global books is a modest Trademate edge in raw count.

Day-to-day UX

Tie

Trademate Sports focuses on value-bet delivery through automated alerts, CLV tracking, and performance analytics dashboards. The educational content library built over years of operation is a genuine resource for new value bettors. Sharkbetting adds BetStream, a live exchange-activity community feed, plus Telegram alerts configurable per-user with exchange and commission parameters. Both have Discord communities. Neither has a native mobile app currently. Sharkbetting's matched-betting calculators and BFB247 workflow give it broader UX scope beyond pure value-bet delivery.

๐Ÿ“ŠTrademate's bet-tracking dashboard

Trademate ships a polished bet-tracking dashboard that auto-imports placed bets, computes CLV per bet, and visualizes yield over time. For sharp bettors who treat their portfolio like a tradable book, the analytics layer is genuinely sophisticated.

Sharkbetting integrates with BFB247 for exchange-bet tracking, and the standalone tracker is functional but less analytics-forward than Trademate's. If portfolio-level CLV reporting is your priority, Trademate's dashboard wins; for the broader workflow (value + matched + volume + arb in one tool), Sharkbetting's integrated tracker plus BetStream covers more ground.

๐ŸŽฏWhy Trademate uses Pinnacle as the baseline

Trademate's methodology rests on Pinnacle's reduced-juice positioning. Pinnacle famously runs a high-volume, low-margin model and accepts sharp action without restricting accounts, which makes their prices a defensible proxy for sharp consensus. This is a real philosophical argument and Trademate has 10+ years of CLV data anchored to it.

Sharkbetting's argument: in liquid EU markets, Betfair Exchange carries deeper real-money liquidity than Pinnacle's bookmaker volume, and exchange prices reflect actual sharp positioning rather than a sharp bookmaker's model. Both are defensible sharp baselines; we argue exchange-baseline wins where Betfair liquidity is deep, and Pinnacle-baseline can win on illiquid markets where Pinnacle takes meaningful action.

Frequently asked questions

Is Sharkbetting cheaper than Trademate Sports?
Yes, dramatically. Trademate Core runs approximately $120/mo (most popular tier) and Pro runs approximately $400/mo, both targeting experienced bettors with large bankrolls. Sharkbetting offers a permanent free plan and a single Pro tier at EUR 1/mo. Active BFB247 clients who place 10+ exchange bets in 30 days (via our BFB247 link or directly on sharkbetx) receive Sharkbetting Pro at no additional charge, making the effective cost EUR 0.
What is the difference between Trademate and Sharkbetting for value betting?
Trademate Sports uses Pinnacle's closing line as the sharp-market baseline for expected-value calculations. Sharkbetting's Match View compares odds against live Betfair and Polymarket exchange prices using the formula outcome_rating = ((bookmaker_price - 1) / (exchange_price - 1)) * 100. Ratings above 100% signal a value bet. Both methodologies are respected by professional bettors; the key difference is Pinnacle-as-book versus exchange-as-market.
Does Trademate Sports offer a free plan?
No. Trademate offers a two-week trial and a 10% discount on the first month via referral, but there is no permanent free tier. The cheapest viable entry is approximately $120/mo for the Core plan (the US-only $49 tier is geo-restricted to US sports). Sharkbetting's free plan is permanent and includes all leagues, all bookmakers, and an 8-minute odds refresh rate, with no credit card required to sign up.
Does Sharkbetting support Polymarket as an exchange baseline?
Yes. Sharkbetting integrates Polymarket prices alongside Betfair as exchange benchmarks in the getDelta rating system. The Polymarket bridge updates every 5 seconds via the sb-odds-service database connection. Trademate Sports does not offer Polymarket integration; it relies on Pinnacle as its sharp-market benchmark. Polymarket support makes Sharkbetting unusual among EU value-betting tools.
Which tool is better for matched betting in the EU?
Sharkbetting is the stronger choice for EU matched bettors. It includes Oddsmatcher, BFB247 exchange integration, lay-bet calculators, BetStream community intelligence, and Telegram alerts all in one platform. Trademate Sports is a pure value-betting scanner with no matched-betting functionality. For bettors who want to combine matched betting and value betting in a single workflow, Sharkbetting is purpose-built.
Which platform has better Nordic coverage?
Both tools have genuine Nordic roots. Trademate Sports is Norwegian-founded and has long-standing brand recognition across Scandinavia, with coverage of major EU bookmakers including Unibet and Bet365. Sharkbetting covers the same Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, and Champions League markets through its BFB247 partnership. For pure brand familiarity in Norway, Trademate has a head start. For price and matched-betting workflow, Sharkbetting wins.
What bankroll do I need to use Trademate Sports?
Trademate Pro recommends a starting bankroll of approximately GBP 20,000, according to third-party reviews. The Core plan targets softer bookmakers and requires less capital, but the $120/mo subscription cost still means a meaningful ROI threshold before breaking even on tool cost alone. Sharkbetting has no minimum bankroll requirement, and the free plan lets bettors start learning matched-betting methodology with any amount.

About the author

Erik Andersson
Erik Andersson

Content & Marketing Specialist

Erik writes Sharkbetting's product comparisons and methodology guides. He covers value betting, matched betting, and exchange-baseline rating systems for European sports bettors, with a focus on practical workflows and tooling decisions.

Read more articles by Erik Andersson

Trademate Sports starts at $120/mo. Sharkbetting is free.

Try Sharkbetting's free plan first. All bookmakers, all markets, 8-minute refresh. No credit card required.

Start free

No card required. Upgrade any time.