Bookmaker Atlas · Cluster File

12 bookmakers in the Softswiss cluster.

Softswiss is a B2B sportsbook platform vendor. The brands below are independent operators licensed to run on Softswiss's software. They share infrastructure, not ownership.

Brands in cluster
12
Strong licences
0
Median trust
39/100
  • 0 at 80+
  • 0 at 60-79
  • 6 at 40-59
  • 6 under 40
Shared across all brands
Back-end, odds feed, settlement engine
Stays under each brand
Licence, dispute rights, withdrawal policy
Read the cluster brief
Automated trust score. This rating is computed from public license, KYC, payment, and reputation data. It is not a manual human review. See methodology.

What the data says about the Softswiss cluster

Where the cluster lands

Median trust score in this cluster: 39/100. That is 1 point below the Atlas-wide median of 40/100. Within the B2B platform category, this cluster's median sits at position 6 of 7 (sorted lowest to highest).

Across 12 scored brands: 6 at 40-59, 6 under 40.

Where brands operate

Brands in this cluster accept players from 3 countries in total. The biggest concentrations are Switzerland (1 brand), Norway (1 brand), Sweden (1 brand).

Most common red flags

Atlas has not aggregated specific red-flag patterns for this cluster yet.

Find your bookmaker

All 12 brands running on Softswiss. Search by name or filter by licence tier. The dot beside each brand shows what tier its operator's licence holds.

Showing 12 of 12

Which regulators license Softswiss brands

The licence each brand holds is what determines your dispute rights, segregated-funds protection, and complaint channel. Most brands in this cluster sit under the regulators listed below.

RegulatorTierBrandsShare
Kahnawake Gaming CommissionTier 2 (mid-strength)18%
Curacao eGamingTier 3 (light-touch)217%

Tier is Atlas' classification of regulator strength based on dispute-resolution, segregated funds, and enforcement track record.

What each licence tier actually means for you
Tier 1 (strictest)
Tier 1 regulators (UKGC, MGA, Spelinspektionen, ADM, ANJ, the Dutch KSA) require segregated player funds, binding alternative dispute resolution, and active enforcement. If a brand under this tier withholds your payout, you can escalate to the regulator and decisions are binding on the operator. Strict KYC and AML rules apply; expect verification on first withdrawal.
Tier 2 (mid-strength)
Tier 2 regulators (Gibraltar, Alderney, Isle of Man, Kahnawake, KSA-old, US state-level) license operators with a formal rulebook and complaints channel, but enforcement is less mature than tier 1 and outcomes are not always binding. Useful for catching outright fraud; less useful when a brand simply makes commercial decisions you disagree with.
Tier 3 (light-touch)
Tier 3 regulators (Curacao, Anjouan) operate registration-style licensing with low public enforcement and limited mediation. The licence proves the brand has paid registration fees, not that it has been audited. Practical recourse on a withheld payout is the public complaint trail (review aggregators), not the regulator.
Other / regional
These brands hold regional or newly-issued licences that Atlas has not yet tier-classified, or operate without a tracked licence. Treat as unknown protection: the underlying licence may be strong or weak depending on jurisdiction. Check the brand-specific audit before depositing, especially for payment delays or payout-limit history.

If you have an account at a Softswiss brand

Softswiss provides the back-end. Your account lives at the brand operating on top of it. The platform itself does not hold your funds or your dispute rights, the brand and its licence do.

  1. Step 1

    Verify the brand's own licence

    Softswiss-powered does not equal regulated. Check the licence authority the brand actually holds and confirm it appears on the regulator's public register.

  2. Step 2

    Read the brand-level audit, not the platform-level

    Atlas scores each brand individually. Two brands on the same platform can score very differently because licence and operator behaviour vary.

  3. Step 3

    Test withdrawal flow before depositing large

    Most platform-clone disputes are operator-side: payout caps, KYC delays, account closure. Run a small withdrawal first so you know the brand's settlement behaviour.

  4. Step 4

    Keep records the brand cannot edit

    Screenshots of bet receipts, deposit confirmations, and chat logs. If something goes wrong, this evidence is what the regulator or chargeback process needs.

Frequently asked: bookmaker clusters

Which brand in the Softswiss cluster holds the strongest licence?

N1bet sits highest on the licence ladder among brands running on Softswiss. It holds a Tier 2 licence and carries an Atlas trust score of 54/100. Even within a shared-infrastructure cluster, brand-level licence quality is what determines your dispute rights, not the platform vendor.

How concentrated are licence types in the Softswiss cluster?

Kahnawake Gaming Commission licenses 1 of the 12 brands in the cluster (8%). Across all brands tracked here, Atlas has recorded 0 individual red-flag entries spanning 0 distinct recurring issues. A heavy concentration under any single licensor is a signal that the cluster's dispute-resolution behaviour will mirror that regulator's enforcement track record.

Why does Atlas group these 12 brands together?

They share an operator, an odds engine, a platform, or all three. Atlas tracks the affiliation so a player can see when "different" brands are run by the same back-end. The grouping comes from public regulator filings, corporate ownership disclosures, and infrastructure fingerprinting, not from guesswork.

Does sharing infrastructure mean shared problems?

Often yes. A withdrawal delay, an independent web-security flag, or a regulator action against one brand in the cluster is usually a sign of the same on the rest. Atlas score components that track infrastructure (security, threat intelligence) tend to move together for sibling brands.

Why pick one brand over another in the same cluster?

License jurisdiction is the single biggest reason. A brand licensed in the UK or Malta gives a player binding dispute-resolution rights that the same operator running under a Caribbean license does not. Brand-specific support staffing and country availability also matter.

Are payments and withdrawals tied to the operator or the brand?

Tied to the operator in most clusters. If the operator has a payout-delay history, the player will see it regardless of which brand label they signed up under. Atlas surfaces the operator-level evidence on every clone page.

How does the Atlas score handle sibling brands?

Each brand scores independently, but the evidence trail often overlaps. If a regulator fines the operator, every sibling brand under that operator picks up the fine in the threat-intelligence component. The license component scores per-brand because licenses are issued per-brand.

Trust score computed from 6 weighted components (licensing, corporate, security, reviews, threat intel, operational). License data verified against public authority records. Last verified 53 days ago.

See full Trust Score v2 methodology | about the data

Gamble responsibly.

Sports betting involves risk. Only bet what you can afford to lose. Bookmakers listed here may not be legal in your jurisdiction. Verify local laws before registering an account.

Support is available 24/7: GamCare | BeGambleAware | National Council on Problem Gambling (US)

18+ Must be of legal gambling age in your jurisdiction.