Trust Score 33/100
33/1006 componentsRead full audit Independent · No affiliate kickbackWoodcock
Is it safe to bet with? Licence, owner and complaint record, verified 2026
- ACTIVE LICENCES
- 0
- PLAYER REVIEWS
- 3
No live licences tracked
Review platforms + apps
Our independent 0-100 check, computed from public records. Not paid for, not editable by operators.
Quick scan
- LicenseUnlicensed
- EnforcementNo fines
- AppsiOS + Android
- Markets1 countries
Author and sources
Woodcock at a glance
At a glance
Woodcock places at #1,602 of 1,806 bookmakers we track and earns no live licence in tracked registers. The trust score and tier shown in the header above are broken down by 6 weighted components in the score panel below.
What's behind the 33/100
6 weighted checks, total 100. Each bar shows the score, weight, and what it means.
What this score means: Atlas could not verify licensing signals for this brand.
Evidence: No active licenses matched
What this score means: Atlas could not verify corporate signals for this brand.
Evidence: No corporate-ownership disclosure found
What this score means: Multiple security signals failing. Mozilla Observatory grade poor or critical CVEs nearby.
Context: A technical measure of HTTP-header hardening and DNS hygiene, not evidence of a breach or unsafe funds.
Evidence: Mozilla Observatory: F
What this score means: Atlas could not verify reviews signals for this brand.
Evidence: No usable review signals (TP<50 reviews or missing)
What this score means: No fraud-intel hits, no AML enforcement actions, no KEV CVEs on infrastructure.
Evidence: No threat-intel hits
What this score means: Atlas could not verify operational signals for this brand.
Evidence: Domain age unknown
Weight the Trust Score yourself
Drag the sliders to match your own priorities. Woodcock’s score recomputes live with the published weighting rules (missing data counts as a conservative prior at half weight). See the full methodology for red-flag and coverage caps.
Your weighted score
33
Atlas default
33
Delta
+0.3
Licensing & regulatory footprint
Unverified regulatory status.
Country access
Hover or tap a region for the country list.
Europe0 accepted, 0 blocked
Americas0 accepted, 0 blocked
Asia0 accepted, 0 blocked
Africa0 accepted, 0 blocked
Oceania1 accepted, 0 blocked
Activity timeline
Atlas tracked 4 timeline sources for this brand: licence registers, UKGC enforcement sitemap, certificate transparency, atlas verification. 1 returned signal so far. Atlas first observed this brand on 2026-04-19.Latest event: Atlas last verified on 2026-04-19.
Public reviews
What to expect
Identity checks
Standard: ID on first withdrawal
A general expectation for this brand type, not an individually verified KYC audit. Check the operator’s own terms before depositing.
Mobile apps
How we know: Apple App Store + Google Play Store metadata, atlas brand catalogue. Last checked 2026-04-19.
Not convinced by Woodcock?
These brands currently outscore Woodcock in the Atlas ranking. Same scoring code, no placement fees; check that each holds a licence in your country before switching.
Frequently asked questions
Is Woodcock safe?
Woodcock has a Trust Score of 33/100 with low data confidence. It rates below average and warrants caution: licensing 0/100, reviews 50/100, corporate 10/100, security 15/100. No active red flags are recorded against the brand.
Does Woodcock have a mobile app?
Woodcock ships a native iOS app verified against the App Store listing. On the App Store, "Hunting Calls: Woodcock" rates 5.00/5 across 3 reviews, published by Sergii Nesterenko (App Store category: Sports). Store ratings reflect user satisfaction with the app itself, not the underlying betting product, and can drift after major updates.
Where is Woodcock available?
Woodcock accepts players from 1 jurisdiction per atlas data, including Australia. Availability lists are derived from public terms-of-service pages and licence registers; geofencing rules can be tighter than what is publicly stated, and accounts opened from restricted IPs are usually voided. Always verify your specific country on the official site before depositing.
What are alternatives to Woodcock?
Alternatives in the same operator family (parent group: my-track-price) include beazabet, bookie-price, davebet. Same-family sites typically share the platform, licensing posture, payment rails, and corporate ownership, so a complaint pattern, regulator action, or AML failure at one site frequently recurs across siblings. Compare independent Trust Scores side by side before switching, and check whether the alternative holds the same licences in your country.
Is Woodcock's site secure?
Woodcock scores 15/100 on the Trust Score v2 security component, indicating noticeable hardening gaps. Signals include: Mozilla Observatory grade F; HSTS enabled. The security component blends HTTP-header hardening (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options), TLS configuration, DNS hygiene (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), CDN/WAF presence, and hosting reputation; it does not assess the operator's internal security or breach history.
Compare Woodcock to alternatives
Pick up to two other atlas brands and see the verifiable stats side-by-side.
| Metric | This brand Woodcock | Alternative 1 Not selected | Alternative 2 Not selected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 33/100 | ||
| Tier | No tier | ||
| Active licences | 0 | ||
| Player reviews | 3 | ||
| Top regulator | None listed | ||
| Regulator actions | None on file |
Brands listed by Trust Score. Comparison uses the same data Atlas publishes on each brand’s own page.
Where to go next?
You have seen the data. Pick your next step:
Ready to decide?
Now that you have seen the data, take 30 seconds to get a personalised verdict for your situation.
Should you sign up at Woodcock?
Three questions, personalised verdict against this brand’s actual atlas data.
Answer all three questions to see a personalised verdict for Woodcock.
0 of 3 answered
Explore related atlas pages
Author and sources
Sources (1)
Citations backing every factual claim in this Woodcock profile, grouped by category. Atlas verifies each source on the date shown. External links open in a new tab.
Other (1)
- [1]Web-security scan of woodcock.io (grade F) (Mozilla HTTP Observatory)Accessed
Trust score computed from 6 weighted components (licensing, corporate, security, reviews, threat intel, operational). License data verified against public authority records. Last verified 53 days ago. Sources cited: 1.
Last updated: 19 Apr 2026
Gamble responsibly.
Sports betting involves risk. Only bet what you can afford to lose. Bookmakers listed here may not be legal in your jurisdiction. Verify local laws before registering an account.
Support is available 24/7: GamCare | BeGambleAware | National Council on Problem Gambling (US)
18+ Must be of legal gambling age in your jurisdiction.